
Guidance for projects that require a recognized and performance-base...

Blink Energy Services provides end-to-end support for National Green...

BASELINE VS. PROPOSED DESIGN
Energy modeling compares two versions of the same building.
The comparison between these two models determines whether the project meets the required performance threshold for compliance or program participation.

A code-minimum reference design

The actual design you plan to build
WHY ENERGY MODELING MATTERS
Modeling provides clarity early in design and supports smarter,
data-driven decisions.
Energy modeling is especially valuable when:
Prescriptive Requirements cannot be
met or are financially burdensome
Flexibility is needed between envelope,
mechanical, and lighting systems
AEGB or NGBS requires
performance verification
Owners want clarity to guide
design decisions
Variances or alternative compliance
methods must be justified
Understanding long-term operational
impacts is important


WHY MODEL INSTEAD OF USING COMCHECK OR RESCHECK
Blink helps teams evaluate whether modeling or prescriptive
compliance is the most efficient and effective approach.
Performance modeling may be the better choice when:
Prescriptive paths are too
restrictive
The building has complex glazing or
shading conditions
System trade-offs are required to meet
the code
Above-code programs require
performance scoring
Reduce project costs and maintain
energy compliance
Reducing mechanical capacity or
envelope cost is a priority
TYPES OF ENERGY MODELS WE PROVIDE
We support multiple use cases and group our energy modeling services into
three categories:
Used when programs such as AEGB or NGBS require documented performance verification.
Used to compare design options and understand how envelope or mechanical decisions impact energy use and cost.
TIMELINE
Energy modeling typically requires 3 to 6 weeks, depending on project size and complexity.
The process is most effective when started early in design, allowing time for collaboration,
optimization, and meaningful decision-making before permitting.
Week 1
Project Kickoff
Week 2
Data Collection
Week 3
Model Development
Week 4
Analysis
Week 5
Optimization
Week 6
Final Report
Typical: 3–4 weeks
Complex: 5–6 weeks
HOW BLINK HELPS
We focus on compliance clarity, explaining how the energy model supports the chosen compliance path and what the results mean.
We simplify design decisions by translating modeling outputs into clear summaries that support efficient and informed choices.
We support program documentation, preparing the required deliverables for AEGB, NGBS, and municipal review.
We keep projects moving. Energy modeling is coordinated to minimize rework and avoid delays during the plan review and permitting process.

OUR PROCESS

We confirm whether modeling is required and which performance path applies.

We gather envelope, mechanical, lighting, and control system information.

We develop baseline and proposed models using the applicable standards.

We provide a clear summary and discuss how results affect your project.

We prepare the reports required for municipal review or above-code programs.

NEED HELP?

It depends on design features, jurisdiction, and program requirements. Blink can determine this during an initial review.

Yes. Many projects use modeling instead of prescriptive compliance when flexibility is needed.

No. Modeling is most effective when it is started early in the design process. Blink works with project schedules to avoid delays.

Yes. Modeling can reveal cost-saving opportunities, support value engineering decisions, and evaluate mechanical strategies.
Blink Energy Services provides energy modeling and compliance support
nationwide, working closely with project teams, municipalities, and third-
party inspectors across the U.S.
